Problems


Repositories are the evidence; the problems are the story. Crowded and rising is where the fight is — crowded and falling is a problem that was solved or abandoned.

Panel window January–July · refreshed monthly · last collected Aug 18, 2026

Problems below the significance floor — fewer than 40 people in February — are drawn hollow and sorted last. A move from eight people to nineteen is a handful of humans, not a trend.

HOLDING SHAREFEW REPOSCROWDED →RISING SHARE →model-accesshuman-oversightagent-appsmedia-generationdesign-and-uievaluationotherlearning-aiagent-frameworks

All problems

ProblemReposFebruary shareJuly shareTrendChange
context-and-prompts843.2%4.6%1.44×
human-oversight574.8%6.8%1.43×
model-access12412.9%16.5%1.28×
inference-efficiency624.6%5.9%1.27×
agent-apps668.7%10.6%1.22×
monitoring413.2%3.9%1.20×
other341.3%1.4%1.09×
safety-and-security421.5%1.6%1.05×
learning-ai1545.0%4.9%0.97×
tools-and-connectors2019.8%9.1%0.93×
multi-agent524.2%3.9%0.92×
coding-agents23137.1%33.7%0.91×
retrieval854.8%3.9%0.81×
computer-use421.5%1.2%0.81×
local-models211.9%1.3%0.69×
speech-and-audio411.6%1.1%0.67×
agent-frameworks10311.7%7.7%0.66×
memory493.8%2.3%0.60×
training361.5%0.8%0.51×
media-generationthin base340.4%1.1%2.89×
design-and-uithin base510.9%1.7%1.91×
evaluationthin base190.8%0.9%1.24×

Each repository is counted once here, under its first label. To see the repositories behind any one of these, filter the Watchlist by problem — that filter matches any of a repository’s labels, so it lists more than the count above.

These readings come from a rolling panel of 66,704 accounts, all polled across the full window; 20,330 recorded any activity inside it. How this is measured